Meta:Requests for adminship/NuclearWarfare

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

NuclearWarfare[edit]

Scheduled to end 23:56, 17 October 2009

NuclearWarfare (talk • contribs • count • logs • page moves • block log • CA • email)

Dear community, I am nominating NuclearWarfare for adminship because I believe he will be a fine addition to the admin team here on Meta.

So far, NW has 440+ edits on Meta (including deleted ones), and he frequently helps out by monitoring RecentChanges to revert vandalism. He is already trusted with the admin tools on the English Wikipedia and on Commons. In addition, NW has the global rollback flag, and he is active in combating crosswiki vandalism. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 23:55, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate acceptance: I accept. Thank you for the nomination, J.delanoy. NW (Talk) 23:56, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support as nom. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 23:59, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Sure. Tiptoety ^talk 00:03, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:35, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Trustworthy user. – Katerenka (talk • contribs) 00:43, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support MBisanz ^talk 01:02, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZMcBride 02:54, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Sounds good. :) Cirt (talk) 06:33, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Erwin 10:47, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Wutsje 10:59, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support --თოგო ^(D) 12:05, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Obviously. Pmlineditor ∞ 12:07, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support yes :)--Nick1915 -^{all you want} 14:37, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Dferg 15:42, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support –blurpeace ^(talk) 22:03, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support. PeterSymonds 23:19, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
sure -- Mercy (☎|✍) 08:38, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adambro 18:24, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Maximillion Pegasus 20:50, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Seha 20:59, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support - per nom, always good to have more people to help out and he's active, why not Jamesofur 21:41, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support --.snoopy. ✉ 11:10, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I trust this user and I agree with everything the nominator said. Razor flame 00:20, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 22:09, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ar son - will be just fine :) - Alison ^❤ 22:15, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support LeinaD (t) 23:18, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kanjy 08:30, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted.—Anonymous Dissident^Talk 00:16, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]