Talk:Association of Anarchist Wikipedians

Isn't an association of anarchist Wikipedians self-contradictory? --Slowking Man 07:32, Apr 1, 2005 (UTC)

It's not much of an "association"... check out the list of members (one, as of now). W:User:harry491

Not really. As long as there's no formal rules or hierarchy I don't see it as an issue.. anarchists aren't opposed to people working in informal association with one another, just in using those associations to create an oppressive social hierarchy. Sarge Baldy 21:06, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Comments

Please first read the Wikipedia article about anarchism. The rest of the text here doesn't make sense. Guaka 00:09, 4 Jul 2005 (UTC)

I don't know how you mean.

I mean that most of the text doesn't have anything to do with anarchism. It's just bullshit. But that's probably its purpose. Guaka 14:52, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

Criticism

I find it ironic,hypocritical and somewhat humorous that any Anarchic organization, Wiki or otherwise, would have an election for anything. Why bother with even being in an organization for that matter? I think organizing anarchy at all is at the very fringes of what can be called "Anarchic".

Just curious about this, please direct your angry comments towards my Wikipedia user page, my username is karmafist.

I responded to this some time ago on his talk page, for anyone who is interested. Sarge Baldy 22:40, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

once upon a time there was some poop

poopface mcwilliams is that unequivocal dean. yaaaa Schzzly 04:49, 10 March 2006 (UTC)