Movement Charter/Community Consultations/2023/Yogyakarta Wikimedian Community by Arcuscloud

Movement Charter

FAQ

Content

Community Consultation

Drafting Committee

Ratification vote

General Information

• Feedback channels: Live meeting & WhatsApp
• Number of participants: 5

Feedback

Global Council

Open Questions regarding Fund Dissemination

• What role should the Global Council have in fund dissemination?
  • Oversight or review of WMF decisions
  • Coordination with WMF
  • Other (please elaborate)
• Should there be a committee that reports to the Global Council and handles central/cross-regional fund dissemination?
• What should be the Global Council’s role with regards to the allocation of the funds within the WMF?
  • The Global Council should be consulted on the allocation of the funds within the WMF.
  • The Global Council should have no role in the allocation of the funds within the WMF and only be informed.
  • Other (please elaborate)

Open Questions regarding Structure

• Should the Global Council exist only as an executive body or should it exist as an executive body with an advisory board? (See scenarios below)
  • If the Global Council is an executive body with an advisory board, how are the members of both entities (executive body and advisory board) seated?
• With its size, the Global Council must have adequate diversity and clout, but not be so large as to undermine effectiveness. As an executive body, how many members should the Global Council have?
  • Option 1: 9-13 members
  • Option 2: 17-21 members

• If Global Council as excutive body with an advisory board, then that advisory board should have clear structure including their duty, and how far advisory board roles in the body of Global Council.
• Both option 1 and option 2 do not provide clear reason why Global Council should have these two option (option 1 for 9 - 13 members and option 2 for 17 -21 members). Community will accept any option of how many members in Global Council as long as there is acceptable reason of how many members in Global Council.

Open Questions regarding Membership

With an intention to ensure fair representation, power balance, and promote diversity and inclusivity within the Global Council, we seek your inputs on the following:

1. Should there be some imposed limits to the membership in terms of movement representation?

Please share your opinions about potential criteria of such limits:

1. Should there be a regional cap, e.g. max 3 persons from a single region? If yes, please specify the condition.
2. Should there be a home project or entity cap, e.g. max 2 persons from a single wiki project or affiliate? If yes, please specify the condition.
3. Should there be a specific cap for large language communities, projects, or affiliates, e.g. not more than 5 seats from between the 5 largest projects? If yes, please specify the condition.
4. Should there be any other limits for Global Council membership? If yes, please specify the condition.

Other feedback about the draft chapter:

• ...
• ...
• ...

Hubs

Community Question: Should there be a limit to how many hubs an affiliate can join? (Please elaborate on your answer.)

Yes, it should be a limit to how many hubs an affiliate can join. the less affiliate join many hubs, the more efective hubs working and overseeing.

Other feedback about the draft chapter:

• Hubs as a new structure should assist communities on developing their Wikimedia projects, not hinder communities work with complicated bureaucracy.
• ...
• ...

Roles & Responsibilities

• It would be better to provide reader how communities are recognized by Wikimedia Foundation.
• ...
• ...

Glossary

• ...
• ...
• ...

Miscellaneous feedback

• ...
• ...
• ...